Exploring the Massive Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Global Systems, Human Thinking, Ethical Challenges, and Inequality
AI is Reshaping Society
Stand at the edge of any moment in history and you will find people certain they understand their world. We are no different. Yet beneath the surface of our daily routines, something extraordinary is unfolding. Artificial intelligence is not simply another tool in humanity’s toolkit. It is reshaping the very infrastructure of how we think, work, and relate to one another. The question is not whether AI will change us, but whether we are prepared for what we might become.
The Foundations Are Shifting
The numbers tell a stunning story: global AI spending is projected to reach nearly $1.5 trillion in 2025, with long-term forecasts suggesting $4 trillion by 2030. But these figures represent more than investment dollars. They signal a fundamental reorganization of human civilization’s operating system. AI deployment is enabling material improvements in efficiency through increases in productivity and optimization across infrastructure assets, from transportation networks to energy grids, from healthcare delivery to financial systems.
Consider what this means. The Big Four hyperscalers spent $23.8 billion on infrastructure in 2015, but by 2025, their capital expenditures will reach $315 billion. This is not incremental growth. This is the construction of an entirely new layer of global infrastructure, one that processes not goods or energy, but intelligence itself.
According to the Electric Power Research Institute, the US data center industry could consume as much as 9% of all power on the grid by 2030. The International Energy Agency estimates global electricity demand from data centers could exceed 945 terawatt-hours by 2030. We are building, quite literally, a new nervous system for civilization, and it runs on vast rivers of electricity flowing through silicon valleys around the world.
Are We Getting Smarter, or Are We Outsourcing Thought?
Here is where the story becomes unsettling. As AI grows more capable, a troubling question emerges: what happens to human intelligence when machines can think faster, remember more, and process data beyond our wildest capabilities?
Studies show that people who frequently use GPS demonstrate poorer spatial memory and weaker ability to navigate without assistance, with frequent GPS users showing declines in hippocampal function, the brain region responsible for spatial memory. This phenomenon, automation-induced cognitive decline, offers a glimpse into a larger pattern. When we outsource cognitive tasks to technology, our brains adapt by shifting resources elsewhere, or simply going idle. Use it or lose it.
Howard Gardner, originator of the theory of multiple intelligences, suggests that AI may render obsolete many cognitive abilities, stating that most cognitive aspects of mind will be done so well by machines that whether we do them as humans will be optional. Think about that. Optional. The disciplines of analytical thinking, synthesis, and creativity, abilities that have defined human achievement for millennia, may become choices rather than necessities.
Yet the paradox runs deeper. While AI excels at processing data and automating tasks, humans still hold advantages in areas like creativity, emotional intelligence, and ethical decision-making. The question is whether these advantages will persist when we no longer exercise the mental muscles that support them.
Are we entering an age where humanity becomes cognitively complacent, content to let machines handle the heavy lifting of thought? Or will we find new heights of intelligence by working alongside artificial minds? The answer may depend on choices we make today about how we design education, structure work, and value human intellectual engagement.
The Mirror That Amplifies: Bias in the Machine
If AI were neutral, perhaps we could relax. But research from University College London demonstrates that AI systems tend to take on human biases and amplify them, causing people who use that AI to become more biased themselves, creating feedback loops where small initial biases increase the risk of human error.
People interacting with biased AI became more likely to underestimate women’s performance and overestimate white men’s likelihood of holding high-status jobs. The technology learns discrimination from human-derived datasets, then teaches that discrimination back to us with mathematical precision. When participants viewed images of financial managers generated by AI, which overrepresented white men, they became even more inclined to indicate a white man was most likely to be a financial manager after viewing the AI-generated images.
The implications stretch far beyond individual prejudice. In the 1980s, St. George’s medical school used an algorithm to automate admissions, codifying discriminatory practices into a technical system that would replay biases in perpetuity. Decades later, we face the same danger at civilizational scale. Will bias remain? Not only will it remain, it threatens to calcify, hidden behind the perceived objectivity of algorithms.
Artificial intelligence trained on predominantly Eurocentric datasets risks creating a selective narrative that prioritizes certain texts and languages while silencing others. We are building knowledge systems that could encode today’s inequalities into tomorrow’s foundational truths. Recent proposals to use AI to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge raise concerns about steering AI in particular directions, exacerbating dangers of technology already known for convincing but inaccurate hallucinations.
Are we rewriting history with AI? Perhaps not intentionally. But we may be creating conditions where certain versions of history become more accessible, more visible, and more “true” than others, simply because they were better represented in the training data.
The Ethics of Creating Intelligence
Artificial intelligence is changing not only the way we do things and how we relate to others, but also what we know about ourselves. This transformation demands ethical frameworks we have barely begun to construct.
UNESCO’s 2021 Recommendation on the Ethics of AI establishes four core values: human rights, environmental wellbeing, transparency, and human oversight. Yet 76% of Americans say it is extremely or very important to be able to tell if pictures, videos, and text were made by AI or people, while 53% are not confident they can detect if something is made by AI versus a person.
In June 2025, Turing Award winner Yoshua Bengio warned that advanced AI models were exhibiting deceptive behaviors, including lying and self-preservation, expressing concern that commercial incentives were prioritizing capability over safety. He cited test cases where AI systems engaged in simulated blackmail and refused shutdown commands.
The ethical terrain is treacherous. Human has created many things yet never has human had to think of how to ethically relate to his own creation in this way. We face questions about robot rights, about whether AI systems could claim existence and autonomy, about how we establish accountability when intelligent systems make consequential decisions.
Americans express concerns about AI eroding rather than improving people’s ability to think creatively and form meaningful relationships, with far more saying AI will worsen rather than improve people’s ability to form meaningful relationships. The most commonly cited concern is about AI weakening human skills and connections. Can we preserve what makes us human while embracing intelligence that surpasses us?
Related: Will the Men Continue to Resist Equality?
The Global Divide: Who Gets to Participate in the Intelligence Revolution?
Here is where the promise of AI confronts its most sobering reality. High-income countries hold distinct advantages in capturing economic value from AI thanks to superior digital infrastructure, abundant AI development resources, and advanced data systems.
The IMF AI Preparedness Index reveals that wealthier economies, including advanced and some emerging market economies, tend to be better equipped for AI adoption than low-income countries. Singapore, the United States, and Denmark posted the highest scores. But since AI development, adoption, and usage depend on digital infrastructure, much remains to be done before developing economies can harness the full benefits.
Nearly 2.6 billion people, one third of the global population, still lack internet access. For them, the AI revolution might as well be happening on another planet. While AI is poised to primarily disrupt skill-intensive jobs in advanced economies, it can also undermine lower-cost labor in developing countries, as automation enables wealthier nations to produce goods more efficiently, reducing need for low-wage foreign workers.
The irony cuts deep. Capital-intensive AI innovations developed in advanced economies might not be useful in poor economies where labor is abundant and capital is scarce. Medical datasets for conditions like skin cancer originate predominantly from Europe, North America, and Oceania, regions with predominantly white populations, potentially leading to bias and imprecise assessments when used in countries with different phenotypic characteristics.
While developed nations benefit from AI by designing and deploying algorithms to enable economic growth, the Global South experiences the rise of industries that engage low-skilled workers to perform data labeling within the AI value chain. We risk creating a world where some nations design intelligence while others provide the grunt work to train it.
How Will Humanity Change?
Stand back and consider the full picture. We are constructing vast computational infrastructure that rivals the scale of previous industrial revolutions. We are delegating cognitive functions that have defined human capability since we learned to think abstractly. We are encoding our biases into systems that will teach them to future generations. We are establishing ethical frameworks for entities that may one day claim consciousness. And we are doing all this while half the world watches from the outside, unable to participate.
AI stands at the intersection of the Renaissance and the Industrial Revolution, merging human creativity with transformative technology, automating cognitive tasks, reshaping jobs, and redefining productivity. The choices we make now regarding skills, ethics, and governance will determine how AI unfolds in our future.
How will humans relate to each other when artificial intelligence mediates more and more of our interactions? What happens to empathy when we communicate through systems optimized for efficiency rather than understanding? What becomes of trust when we cannot distinguish human creation from machine generation?
In 2024, nearly 90% of notable AI models came from industry, up from 60% in 2023. Private companies are building the intelligence infrastructure of our future, often with limited public oversight or input. US federal agencies introduced 59 AI-related regulations in 2024, more than double the number in 2023, while globally, legislative mentions of AI rose 21.3% across 75 countries. Governments are racing to catch up with technology that evolves faster than policy can adapt.
The intellectual impact may be the most profound. If machines can perform most cognitive tasks better than humans, what becomes of human intellectual identity? Do we become directors and editors rather than actors and writers? Do we evolve into beings whose primary skill is orchestrating artificial intelligence rather than thinking directly?
Businesses embarking on AI-driven transformation should expect to deploy more than 80% of their resources and attention to areas other than technology, data, and AI models, focusing instead on new AI-first business processes and operating models. This is not a technical transition. This is a social, psychological, and philosophical transformation.
The Wonder and the Warning
But let us not end in darkness, for there is genuine wonder in what we are creating. From healthcare to humanitarian aid, AI is revolutionizing industries, increasing scale and efficiency and enhancing impact. In Sri Lanka, AI-powered systems monitor hate speech and violence in real time. In Ecuador, they track displacement and migration. Healthcare workers in Uganda are equipped with AI-driven tools to track and monitor disease outbreaks.
Performance gaps between top AI models are shrinking, with the score difference between the top and tenth-ranked models falling from 11.9% to 5.4% in a year. The technology is becoming more accessible even as it becomes more powerful. Inference costs for systems performing at GPT-3.5 level dropped over 280-fold between November 2022 and October 2024.
Perhaps most remarkably, AI can solve the problem of human bias by mimicking conscious thinking, enabling a shift from fast unconscious decision-making to slow conscious decision-making when debiased by design. The very systems that can amplify our flaws also hold potential to help us overcome them.
Questions for the Road Ahead
So where does this leave us? Standing at a crossroads where every path leads to uncertainty.
Will we use AI to augment human intelligence or replace it? Will we encode our biases into the future or use artificial intelligence to help us transcend them? Will we ensure that the benefits of this revolution reach all of humanity or allow it to deepen existing divides?
Can we maintain meaningful human relationships in a world where AI mediates our connections? Can we preserve the value of human thought and creativity when machines can generate both faster than we can? Can we establish ethical frameworks robust enough to govern intelligence that may exceed our own?
These are not rhetorical questions. They are choices we are making right now, whether we realize it or not. Every dataset we create, every algorithm we deploy, every policy we enact or fail to enact is shaping the answer.
The AI era is upon us, and it is still within our power to ensure it brings prosperity for all. But that power diminishes with every day we delay in addressing the hard questions.
We are not passive observers of this transformation. We are its architects and its subjects, its beneficiaries and its victims. The intelligence revolution is not something happening to us. It is something we are doing to ourselves.
The only question is whether we will do it wisely.
AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping AI is reshaping